Standard Chartered analyst Kendrick believes that the low point for Bitcoin has already emerged.
On-chain data indicates that the price is approaching the ‘realized price’, with over half of positions currently at a loss, historically signaling a bottom.

However, net outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs have reached $5.8 billion in a single month, with institutional demand remaining persistently weak.
According to CryptoQuant data, following the recent decline, Bitcoin’s price is now only about 9% above its ‘realized price’ (the average cost of all coins last moved on-chain). Historically, this indicator tends to approach the realized price near major bear market lows, and the current level has entered a historically sensitive zone. Vetle Lunde highlights another metric: currently, more than half of Bitcoin’s circulating supply is in a state of loss, meaning holders’ purchase costs exceed the current market price. This phenomenon has repeatedly appeared near previous market bottoms, with the logic being that the group of investors still in profit and facing selling pressure has significantly narrowed. However, Lunde cautiously notes that before establishing a sustained recovery, Bitcoin could still experience a ‘final drop’. Persistent ETF Outflows: Institutional Demand Becomes the Biggest Concern Yet, compared to typical deep crypto market crashes, the scale of this sell-off remains insufficient. According to CryptoQuant data, the number of Bitcoins on which investors realized losses over the past 30 days was approximately 187,000. While substantial, this figure is far below the sell-off scale following the FTX collapse in late 2022, and even lower than a concentrated selling wave earlier this year. Per Bloomberg-compiled data, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows of approximately $5.8 billion over the past month. CryptoQuant notes that U.S. institutional demand has not only stalled but has turned into net selling at a pace rarely seen historically. This phenomenon has sparked sharply divergent interpretations between bulls and bears. Bears argue that persistent capital outflows indicate deteriorating demand, making it difficult for prices to find effective support. Bulls, however, contend that such outflow scale is a classic characteristic of market cleansing, which historically has often coincided with the formation of market bottoms. The conclusion from CryptoQuant researchers is quite representative: ‘The current price level should be considered a candidate for a valuation bottom, rather than a confirmed cyclical bottom.’ This wording captures the core disagreement in the current market—technical signals are accumulating, but weak demand and persistent ETF outflows make any definitive judgment highly risky.

